Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations bkrike on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Recent content by adevadeh
-
still no seccuss??? (function pointers)
Right, it is void (__cdecl *)(void), but there should be no need to release the pointer or anything like that. Just trunst yourself, you'll be fine. I would suggest that that you look into the C++ construct called functors, or function objects. They allow you to manage function pointers in a...- adevadeh
- Post #6
- Forum: Microsoft: Visual C++
-
still no seccuss??? (function pointers)
EF, No, there is no problem about having multiple references to aglobal function. Your changes to the code do not make much sense, unless you also changed to copy constructor to the following fpReqSer = rhs.fpReqSer; which is what I asked you to do in the first place.- adevadeh
- Post #4
- Forum: Microsoft: Visual C++
-
still no seccuss??? (function pointers)
I posted an answer to your other thread. The idea is that function pointers are the same as any other pointer. Please look at the following example. int a; int *a_ptr; int b; int *b_ptr; a = 100; a_ptr = &a; // now a = 100 and *a_ptr = 100 b = 200; b_ptr = &b; // now b = 200 and *b_ptr = 200...- adevadeh
- Post #2
- Forum: Microsoft: Visual C++
-
Function pointer problem as an event
EF, a::a(const a &rhs) { //*fpReqSer = *rhs.fpReqSer; //something not right??? yes // try this fpReqSer = rhs.fpReqSer; } I had this wonderful huge explanation written out, but I lost it when I clicked on preview. If you want to know why, just post again... -adeh- adevadeh
- Post #6
- Forum: Microsoft: Visual C++
