Option 1. Continuing to use 9+ dialing
A. on ARS line that contains 11 / 911 / Dial emergency / 0... modify entry = 11 to be 11; (add semi-colon)
B. Add new entry on ARS = 11N / / Barred / 0
Effect:
A. 9+911 will reach E911 immediately
B. 911 will reach E911 after dial delay timer expires
C. 911 + any other digit will be barred
Comment: in my experience this eliminates almost all false 911 calls. Most people dial 9+1, then pause, look at number, dial 1+10digitnumber, and bang you've got a false 911 call. This halts that. 9+ dialing is preserved. 911 dialed on its own does get through to E911, albeit slightly delayed.
Option 2. Change to 8+ dialing
A. Change system 9N short code to 8N (all other parameters remain the same)
B. REMOVE the ARS line that contains 11 / 911 / Dial emergency / 0... failure to do this will mean dialing 811 will call 911.
C. Create a new system Short code 911 / Dial Emergency / 911 / 0
Effect:
A. 8+911 will reach E911 immediately
B. 911 will reach E911 immediately
Comments: Has the advantage over option 1 of having no delay for just dialing 911. Disadvantage = it's 8+ dialing, not 9+ dialing (how weird is that???). Has implications for extension numbering (8's and 9's).
Lab Testing: can be tested by setting the ARS to dial your cell or office line instead of E911.
[color #CC0000]Warning: should be tested for real, on site, every single time you deploy.[/color]
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.