Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Tek-Tips
*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Your information in this site is absolutely WONDERFUL. It is the most useful site on the web to me right now. Thank You Thank You..."

Geography

Where in the world do Tek-Tips members come from?

The ultimate question - SAN or NAS -Which is better?

am1go (IS/IT--Management)
27 Oct 00 9:53
I represent a small but rapidly growing internet-based financial company who is growing exponentially every year. Currently we only have 10-15 servers using Solaris and Win2k. We are looking for a backup solution (hardware and software) and we're trying to decide which is better for us in the long run. Do we keep all of our information on one machine and let it grow and handle everything (quite a scary thought to me) or do we setup polling hardware devices on our current switches, routers, hubs, and servers and use what we have already setup and invested money into? I don't expect this to be a fair debate, I was just curious to see if anyone was adiment about either one and why. Thanks.
cfowler (MIS)
24 Nov 00 20:59
am1go,

Hi there.  Don't think there's too much question here.  I would be of the opinion to go with what you already have.  It makes financial sense for starters, it might be a bit of a config nightmare later on, buy you have the benefit of knowing your current systems config so you should be well aware of the requirements prior to proceeding.  It's gosh darn good practice to "never place all of your eggs in one basket"  :)  Yes, it would definitely represent the best practice to go with what you already have implemented and pick up some polling hardware and spread it evenly throughout your current network.

I represent a Corporation with a configuration slightly similar to yours.  Perhaps a few more servers, but only slightly.  We have just over 30 servers in a hybrid networking environment.  However, we currently use a SAN, for our databases and larger file servers, the largest file server weighing in at 170+ GB.  We use a StorageTek 9740 Timberwolf Autochanger with 9840 Tape Drives.  We are currently running this config with Legato Networker version 5.7.0.0 Build 112.  I would recommend a TON of research prior to going with Legato as your solution, unless you are to run it from your Sun Solaris or Unix system.  :)  We run it on NT 4.0 at present and it's been a nightmare so far.  :)  I cannot say enough about the StorageTek or the 9840 drives though.  We are currently backing up around 300 GB worth of data in very close to 2 hours.  Not too bad over a 100Mbps Ethernet Net.  When it works, there's nothing like it, perhaps sky diving though.  :)

Anyhow, wanted to share.

Take care,

CF

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close