Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Tek-Tips
*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...I think the forum is a great idea, especially for those of us in consulting engineering. Keep up the good work!..."

Geography

Where in the world do Tek-Tips members come from?
disturbedone (Vendor)
15 Apr 12 21:13
I'm trying to configure Wake on LAN and have followed http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_configuration_example09186a008084b55c.shtml to how I think it needs to be configured in our environment but it doesn't appear to work.

* 2x Catalyst 4507 (one at each end of campus)
   Main Catalyst 10.10.32.88
* multiple Nortel switches
* a few Cisco switches
* Using Dell KACE which is the WoL server. Is 172.20.95.15
* Various VLANs eg 10,20,21,30,31,100
* DHCP servesr 10.11.0.7 and 10.11.0.8
* My PC 10.100.0.14
* PC to wake up 10.100.0.3

Extract from config (of main Catalyst):

CODE

access-list 101 permit udp host 172.20.95.15 any eq echo
access-list 101 permit udp host 10.100.0.14 any eq echo
interface Vlan100
 ip address 10.100.32.88 255.255.0.0
 ip helper-address 10.11.0.7
 ip helper-address 10.11.0.8
 ip helper-address 10.10.65.90
 no ip redirects
 ip directed-broadcast 101
no ip forward-protocol nd
no ip forward-protocol udp tftp
no ip forward-protocol udp nameserver
no ip forward-protocol udp domain
no ip forward-protocol udp time
no ip forward-protocol udp netbios-ns
no ip forward-protocol udp netbios-dgm
no ip forward-protocol udp tacacs
ip forward-protocol udp echo

WoL is enabled in the BIOS of 10.100.0.3 but when I send the command (using Solarwinds WoL tool) it doesn't start the PC.

Any ideas why it won't work?
disturbedone (Vendor)
17 Apr 12 22:55
It turns out that the SolarWinds WakeOnLAN tool (http://www.solarwinds.com/products/freetools/wake_on_lan.aspx) does not wake up a Dell OptiPlex GX780. And nor does ProfShutdown (http://www.profshutdown.com)

Running Wireshark on a powered on GX780 and sending a magic packet to it from either of these tools shows that it does arrive and from what I can see if looks like it's in the correct format. But it just won't wake up the computer.

Using Dell KACE and also Faronics Deep Freeze to send the magic packet does work...if the BIOS is set correctly. There are 2 settings in a Dell BIOS - one to enable WoL and one to disable lower power.
disturbedone (Vendor)
31 Jul 12 18:54
Following up on this issue.....

WoL works sometimes but not others. I think there are various issues that are affecting this not just one.

Dell KACE was configured to send WoL to all known devices on VLAN20. This would wake some up but not others. Sending WoL to an individual PC that would not be woken by a group message would sometimes work. Sending individual WoL to a PC that would not be woken by a group message would not wake 2 (that I know of) PCs and the cause was the Nortel switch had those ports set to not negotiate connection speed.

Yesterday I reconfigured KACE to send a group WoL in a different way which appeared to be much better. Multiple tests showed that it would wake PCs that it had not woken before. Computers are automatically shutdown at 730pm. KACE was scheduled to WoL at 715am but it did not wake PCs that were being woken perfectly yesterday. This, to me, says that there is something in the Cisco 4507 that means it has forgotten where to find the PC and therefore can't send the WoL to it. Does that sound feasible? In saying that, I just tried sending an individual WoL to a PC that would not be woken by a group message today but would yesterday.

Any ideas?

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members!

Back To Forum

Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close