INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips now!

Talk With Other Members
Be Notified Of Responses
To Your Posts
Keyword Search
One-Click Access To Your
Favorite Forums
Automated Signatures
On Your Posts
Best Of All, It's Free!

*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Tek-Tips LinkedIn^® Group

Join our
LinkedIn^® Group!

Hook up with past and present colleagues and classmates quickly.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site

(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Thanks a lot Mate! I can't tell you how many times your site has saved my "rear". hehe..."

More...

Geography

Where in the world do Tek-Tips members come from?

Click Here To Find Out!

Tek-Tips Shirts!

Get your
Tek-Tips Forums
SWAG here!

Home > Forums > Programmers > EAI Distributed/Component Programming > Microsoft: COM+ Forum

UsersTransactions vs NoTransactions

Read More Threads Like This One

gradley (Programmer)

4 Apr 05 12:02

Hi,

We are currently running VB 6.0 components that do not require transactions because there are no database updates being performed, or only a single update is being performed.

My question is this:

Is there any additional overhead in COM+ if the MTSTransactionMode is set to UsersTransactions instead of NoTransactions? I have read that you should set classes to UsesTransactions for scalibility reasons. We are trying to assist with performance in any way possible.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members!

Back To Forum

Back To Microsoft: COM+